As I predicted earlier this week, the 3M plaintiff’s attack on the constitutionality of the anti-SLAPP statute, in response to an anti-SLAPP motion filed by some of the defendants in that case, has prompted the DC Attorney General to move to intervene in the case for the purpose of defending the statute.
The law strongly supports granting the DC Attorney General’s motion to intervene, and I anticipate that the Court will grant its motion.
